|
"I am a participant in the CEP-1347 (Precept) clinical trial. I came home from a support group meeting on May 11 to find an
email from an acquaintance telling me the study had been cancelled. I went to the Cephalon website and read their press release
– it was true. I immediately emailed the other fifteen trial participants with whom I have corresponded over the past
two years. None of them had been contacted by their doctors or by anyone at Cephalon. We were in the dark. The following
day (May 12) I found out that many of the study centers learned of the cancellation from their participants, who had called
with questions. Still no one had received any notification or guidance from Cephalon.
I knew that there were no guarantees when I signed up for the trial. I knew that most trials failed. Additionally I had accepted
the risk that there might be an increased risk of cancer because CEP-1347 works by turning off the mechanism for cell death.
In the two years I was in the study, I faithfully followed all of the trial’s rules and restrictions.
During the study each participant has two SPECT brain scans: one at the beginning and one at the end of two years. I am scheduled
for my 2nd SPECT scan on May 23-25 at the Institute for Neurodegenerative Disorders (IND) at New haven, CT. On May 12 I emailed
them and then spoke to them on the phone. No, they had heard nothing. They hoped to let me know the following day if my scan
would still take place. (They did not contact me on Friday as hoped.) I had scheduled a personal vacation around this trip
– now what do I do? I wait to learn what to do.
The participants have gotten no direction on what to do now. Neurological drugs should not be stopped suddenly. Do we continue
taking CEP-1347? Do we slowly titrate off? I stopped cold turkey on Wednesday evening. Maybe it was unwisely done, but it
is done. Now will I have adverse side effects from doing this? My doctor was away at the PSG meeting about CEP-1347, and of
course Cephalon had provided no guidance. So I wait to learn what should have been done.
At the time of my SPECT scan, I was promised a copy of the scan(s), and also was told that I would be informed of what dose
(or placebo) I had been on. These would be provided at the end of the trial. The people at the IND didn’t know and said
these details would have to be hashed out. So I wait to receive what was promised.
What would it have cost Cephalon to have waited 24 hours in order to contact the study centers and trial participants? To
leave us in limbo is callous, unprofessional, and potentially dangerous to our health. And yes, I still wait.
In the future Cephalon and other drug companies may have more difficulty recruiting people for upcoming clinical trials. Trial
participants are partners in research and have the right to be treated with respect. This was sadly lacking in Cephalon’s
actions.
Jean B."
|